In Century Surety Co. v. EC & SM Guerra, LLC5:23-CV-01215-XR-RBF, 2025 WL 2602288 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2025) aff’2025 WL 2598375 (Sept. 5, 2025), the US District Courtroom for the Western District of Texas reaffirmed the Justice of the Peace’s report and suggestion holding that as a result of the insured acquired a coverage with its requested limits, Century didn’t breach the insurance coverage contract. The Courtroom additional held that Century had no responsibility to advise the insured of the adequacy of the protection for the insured property.
Factual Background
The insured operates a toddler improvement heart in San Antonio, Texas, and procured a renewal coverage with the insurer, masking its property with a constructing restrict of $635,220, plus further protection for enterprise private property and particles elimination. In 2022, after a fireplace broken the insured’s property, Century paid out the total coverage limits for the construction, particles elimination, and enterprise private property. Dissatisfied with the payout, the insured initiated authorized motion asserting fraud and breach of contract arguing that the protection was inadequate to exchange the broken property and searching for further funds for different coverages comparable to signage, elevated price of compliance, digital information, and beneficial papers. Century responded by submitting a declaratory judgment motion, searching for a ruling that it owed the insured no additional funds beneath the coverage. The circumstances have been consolidated.
Evaluation
The Courtroom discovered that the insured’s fraud claims failed as a result of Century offered the precise insurance coverage coverage the insured requested, together with the said protection limits which appeared on each the applying and the coverage paperwork. The insured was charged with information of the coverage’s phrases, and the Courtroom discovered no responsibility for Century to reveal further details about protection. The Courtroom equally rejected the insured’s argument that it relied upon opposite statements of limits of legal responsibility as a result of the specific phrases of the applying and coverage have been clear. The Courtroom adopted the tenet that an insured occasion is charged with information of its personal insurance coverage coverage, admonishing towards reliance on verbal statements contradicting written agreements.
The Courtroom agreed with Century that it paid the total coverage limits, precluding the insured’s further restoration for signage, beneficial papers, and digital information. Consequently, the insured was not entitled to additional fee beneath the coverage. The Courtroom granted abstract judgment in favor of Century and declared that Century had fulfilled its obligations and owed no additional funds to the insured.
Conclusion
This case highlights the significance of clear, written documentation of the protection limits and phrases requested by an insured. Right here, Century prevailed as a result of it might present that the insured requested and knowingly accepted the protection limits it proposed. Additional, the Courtroom reaffirmed that beneath Texas regulation, an insurer just isn’t typically required to advise policyholders if their chosen protection limits are sufficient because the insured is answerable for understanding and choosing the suitable protection. By guaranteeing policyholders perceive their protection and documenting all transactions, insurance coverage firms can reduce disputes and prevail in litigation.
About The Creator
