There’s one voice Lisseth cannot get out of her head — the pleas of a 22-year-old girl.
In June 2025, the lady had left a bodily abusive companion to return to a shelter that Lisseth helped present in Honduras. By that point the shelter was going through a dire price range shortfall due to overseas support cuts by the U.S. There merely wasn’t sufficient cash to supply sanctuary — and even meals — to all the ladies who wanted it.
“She would say ‘put me to sleep sitting up or give me meals as soon as a day,’ ” Lisseth remembers. ” ‘I am unable to return.’
For the previous 30 years, Lisseth has fought to enhance the lives of ladies in her nation who skilled violence just because they have been ladies. She teamed up with others in her group and opened a number of the first shelters in Honduras for these fleeing abuse. She pushed for coverage adjustments.
However this previous 12 months, as worldwide help was slashed, she’s seen the disintegration of a lot of what she’s constructed. The 22-year-old’s voice echoing in her head — for her, it is the human value of shedding her funding.
Lisseth remembers how the younger girl cherished portray the intricate, colourful geometric patterns of conventional mandalas. “She stated that is how she wished her life — with all the things colourful,” remembers Lisseth.
NPR agreed to make use of solely Lisseth’s center title as a result of she fears talking out would possibly undermine future monetary assist for her ladies’s shelters.
The 22-year-old had come to a type of shelters after being “assaulted not solely psychologically but in addition bodily and sexually,” says Lisseth, talking in Spanish by means of an interpreter. “He possessed weapons. It was very simple for him to kill her and he informed her that.”
This case is strikingly widespread. One in three ladies — greater than 700 million ladies — have skilled, sooner or later of their lifetime, bodily or sexual violence by an intimate companion or sexual violence from a non-partner, in accordance with the World Well being Group. In 2024, Lisseth’s shelters helped greater than 400 of those ladies.
Lisseth remembers that on the day the 22-year-old confirmed up, she stated her companion had almost killed her. Lisseth’s staff let her keep just a few nights as they tried to seek out different lodging. However they knew they weren’t ready to assist her.
Shelters in lots of low- and middle-income international locations face the identical dilemma. The Trump administration’s large cuts in overseas support, together with a slashing of support budgets from different international locations, have had a devastating impression. A world survey by U.N. Ladies revealed in October 2025 discovered that greater than 40% of organizations working to finish violence in opposition to ladies and ladies needed to cut back life-saving providers or shut down utterly previously 12 months due to funding cuts.
“What does it imply in actuality? (It is) that a variety of ladies all over the world will likely be denied entry to protected shelter, medical assist or authorized illustration,” says Kalliopi Mingeirou, the pinnacle of the Ending Violence In opposition to Ladies Part at U.N. Ladies. “It is devastating.”
The U.S. pullback is an enormous a part of the image. A report from the nonprofit Ladies’s Refugee Fee discovered that over $400 million in U.S. overseas support was reduce this previous 12 months from grants that explicitly point out gender-based violence of their title or description.
Applications geared toward combating gender-based violence obtained swept up within the second Trump Administration’s anti-DEI efforts, together with ending government-supported initiatives that point out “gender.” The overwhelming majority of abuse the falls underneath the umbrella class of gender-based violence is in opposition to ladies and ladies and the cuts major impression this inhabitants.
Prior to now, the U.S. had been on the forefront of addressing violence in opposition to ladies, together with in Trump 1.0.
How combatting gender-based violence grew to become “radioactive”
Through the first Trump administration, “Ivanka Trump led quite a few initiatives not solely offering funds for work in opposition to gender-based violence, but in addition for girls’s empowerment, for girls’s financial growth,” explains Beatriz García Gooda analysis analyst for the Latin America Program on the Stimson Heart, a assume tank in Washington, D.C.
This dedication continued underneath President Biden’s administration. García Good says the considering was that ending violence in opposition to ladies internationally was key to stopping one of many root causes of migration.
“The US was the chief in supporting this work. That clearly modified,” she says.
The second Trump administration “by no means stated that violence in opposition to ladies was okay,” explains García Good. “It was simply actually eliminating something that made a reference to gender.”
Earlier than President Trump began his second time period, the hassle to assist ladies going through violence was a bipartisan challenge. Now not, says García Good.
“In lots of international locations, it has turn out to be a problem of the left. It isn’t a human rights challenge anymore,” she says. “It is form of radioactive.”
“This challenge is falling off the agenda. It is like ladies’s wants are disappearing,” says Diana Flórez, a researcher who wrote a report on gender-based violence in Latin America for the Ladies’s Refugee Fee. “At first I assumed: ‘Okay, the U.S. goes to go after which different actors are going to step in.’ That hasn’t occurred.”
Requested to touch upon the lack of funding for applications geared toward addressing gender-based violence, the U.S. State Division despatched an announcement to NPR, which stated that the U.S. continues to supply lifesaving help to ladies and youngsters whereas not supporting the “radical ideologies” of Biden-era applications that “deny organic actuality.”
“She needed to go”
Lisseth’s dedication to serving to ladies who’ve skilled abuse comes from her household’s expertise.
Simply over 30 years in the past, Lisseth urged her youthful sister to go to the Honduran police. Lisseth says her brother-in-law was verbally abusing her sister, who was 20 years his junior. Lisseth thought reporting the scenario to the authorities would possibly assist.
“She did that however, when she returned house, she skilled horrible moments for having reported (it),” remembers Lisseth, who says her sister was pregnant on the time and the abuse solely grew extra intense.
That is when addressing gender-based violence grew to become Lisseth’s life mission.
Again in June, when she had to inform the 22-year-old girl that funding for the shelter could not assist her, Lisseth says it felt as if the lady might have been her youthful sister.
Finances cuts previously 12 months had already compelled Lisseth to chop again on medical care, psychological assist and authorized providers for the ladies her shelters assist. Nowadays, she says her group cannot afford diapers and components for the kids who arrive with their moms. Beds are in brief provide as properly. A number of youngsters pile into the identical bunk mattress as their mother.
Lisseth did the most effective she might do to assist the 22-year-old. “She needed to go. What we did was discover her a assist community by means of a church so they might place her some other place,” Lisseth says.
That is a greater consequence than most, she admits. Her group has needed to flip away greater than 100 ladies and youngsters this previous 12 months. Tearing up, she says, it feels merciless to show them away, particularly in a rustic with one of many highest charges of sexual violence and femicide within the area.
“As a substitute of opening extra locations for extra ladies, we’re decreasing them,” she says. “It’s exhausting, exhausting.”
What does the longer term maintain?
“You may take into account (Honduras) consultant of what’s occurring,” says García Good.
Nancy Glass agrees. In lots of low- and middle-income international locations, “the care is gone, the advocates are gone, the employees gone,” says Glassa professor at Johns Hopkins College of Nursing who has been researching gender-based violence because the Nineteen Nineties.
The impression is particularly unhealthy, she says, due to the pace of the U.S. cuts — “in a single day” — and the truth that “there was simply no planning” by the U.S. to assist Honduras or different international locations deal with the sudden and deep cuts. Simultaneous cuts to different U.S. support initiatives, together with HIV/AIDS and humanitarian disaster work, have compounded the harm, Glass provides, as a result of addressing gender-based violence was usually built-in into different support applications.
“It has been catastrophic,” she says.
After the previous 12 months, she says, the worldwide gender-based violence subject is starting to regroup and work out what to do subsequent.
She says organizations have been discussing how they’ll not be “on the mercy of a basis closing or a authorities having new priorities.” A part of the answer, she thinks, could also be constant funding that comes from taxes or, maybe, teaming up with faith-based organizations which were singled out by the Trump administration to assist implement the nation’s remaining worldwide support work.
In Honduras, Lisseth is much less assured about what could be salvaged. She says she sees no glimmers of hope as extra funding streams dry up and employees who utilized for grants have been laid off.
“We consider that this 12 months the disaster will deepen,” she says, explaining that many ladies — identical to her sister — will want refuge and have fewer and fewer locations to show.
